Blog Topic
News
Personal Injury
[05/18] Wake planned Friday for Mary Richardson Kennedy
[05/18] Newborn infant dies after dog attack at Ohio home
[05/18] Doctor pleased with progress of man hurt in wreck
Read More
Product Liability
[05/17] Honda recalls nearly 53,000 Acura TL sedans in US
[05/10] Inflatable pool slides recalled after 1 death
[05/09] Ford adds Virginia to Windstar minivan recall
Read More
Tort
[05/18] Newborn infant dies after dog attack at Ohio home
[05/18] Wake planned Friday for Mary Richardson Kennedy
[05/18] Doctor pleased with progress of man hurt in wreck
Read More
Topics
18-Wheeler Truck Accidents
Abuse & Neglect Warning Signs
Actos Drug Dangers
Assisted Living Facilities
Auto Insurance
Automobile Recalls and Defects
Autopsy
Bed Sores/Pressure Ulcers
Bicycle Accidents
C-Section
Cancer
Charter Bus Accidents
Construction Zone Accidents
DDD-Division of Developmental Disabilities
Diagnostic Errors
Distracted Driving
Drowning Deaths in Group Homes
Effects of a Concussion
Electronic Stability Control (ESC)
Emergency Room Malpractice
Falls in Nursing Homes
Fatigue in the Medical Workplace
Granny Cams in Nursing Homes
Group Home Health & Safety Standards
Group Homes
Hospital Negligence
Hospitals
Laws Affecting Abuse Cases
Medical Malpractice
Medical Malpractice in Hospitals
Medication Errors
Motorcycle Accidents
Nursing Homes
Pedestrian Safety
Pharmaceutical Errors
Pool Safety
Prevent Drowning
School Negligence
Schools -- Releases and Waivers
Seat Belts and Air Bags
Serious Personal Injury
Social Media
Statutes of Limitations
Surgical Errors
Surgical Infections
Swimming Pool Accidents
Tort Reform
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Trial Court and Appellate Court Victories for Our Clients
Vehicle Safety
Victories on Appeal for the Public
Wrongful Death
Recent Updates
May 15, 2012
Charter Bus Accidents Claim 4,000 Lives Each Year
May 13, 2012
Passed Law Changes Abuse Cases
May 07, 2012
Safety Features for Vehicles
May 01, 2012
Weight Loss Surgical Errors
April 17, 2012
Long-Term Effects of a Concussion
Archives
Trial Court and Appellate Court Victories for Our Clients
??
Changing the Law for the Better: Making Sure that Parents Are Responsible for their Children's Poor Driving
Posted by: David Abney
July 12, 2011
Knapp & Roberts does not just help its own clients. Without charge, Knapp & Roberts time and effort to improving the law for all people who suffer injuries through the fault of others. One of our law firm's most recent successes in protecting the rights of injury victims came through the Arizona Supreme Court's April 5, 2011 opinion in the case of Young v. Beck.
In that case, parents let their 17-year-old son drive their sport-utility vehicle, although the son was immature and a miserable driver. After enough poor driving, the parents eventually told their son that he could use the SUV-but only if he promised to never use it to drive his friends around. Naturally, the son then took the SUV and drove around with several friends throwing eggs at houses and parked cars. The son soon crashed the SUV into a car. The crash badly injured the car's driver.
The son was not just immature, he was broke. So the injured driver sued the son's parents, hoping to recover money for his injuries from their insurance policy. The injured driver argued that the son's parents were liable for the son's negligent driving under an old legal doctrine called the "family-purpose doctrine." It's a fancy name for a simple idea: If parents let their child drive the family car, the parents are liable if the child drives negligently and caused a crash. The parents in the Young case argued that the Arizona Supreme Court should abandon the "family-purpose doctrine" and hold the son-and only the son-responsible for the collision that he had caused.
Knapp & Roberts invested time and effort in supporting the appellate briefs of the injured driver. The time and effort paid off when the Arizona Supreme Court refused to abandon the "family-purpose doctrine." The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that the son's parents were responsible for the consequences of their son's poor driving. The Arizona Supreme Court's decision may eventually help one of Knapp & Roberts's own clients. But even if that never happens, injured people across Arizona will benefit. And that is what really matters.


